I have decided to occasionally post reviews of some award winning or nominated movies I watch on DVD. For my first review this year, Al Pacino and Chris O'Donnell star in the Academy Award nominated movie "Scent of a Woman". This film came out in theaters on December 23rd, 1992. "Scent of a Woman" was nominated for Best Picture, Best Actor, Best Director and Best Adapted Screenplay.
ave one last weekend in New York before he takes his own life. Al Pacino won the Academy Award for Best Actor for his performance as retired Colonel Frank Slade. Frank is blind and hires Chris O'Donnell's character of Charlie to act as his escort around the big city one last time. Of course, nothing is ever that simple as Charlie is informed of Frank's final weekend plan shortly after arrival in NYC. Pacino gives a great performance as the angry, bitter and belligerent Frank, while O'Donnell just does his best not to get bowled over by Pacino's performance. Every other performer on screen is only around for a few minutes, no long enough to actually build much of a character, but Gabrielle Anwar, Phillip Seymour Hoffman, Bradley Whitford and James Rebhorn make do with what they have.
As much as I liked this film, I do understand why it did not win Best Picture or Best Director. In this case, the 2 go hand in hand. I don't think the film's director, Martin Brest, did enough to win the Director award. There was one wonderfully filmed scene of a tango dance, but other than that nothing about the directorial style sticks out to me. It is quite possible that this film was nominated for Best Picture on the strength of Pacino's performance alone, but I would also like to credit the nominated screenplay as well. I thought the dialogue was really well done and popped off the screen at times. I also found the score to be somewhat distracting at times, perhaps trying too hard to convey the emotions that the director wanted to convey.

Overall, I give "Scent of a Woman" 4 out of 5 stars. I was entertained throughout. It could have been a little shorter though, weighing in at over 2 hours and 30 minutes long. Pacino's performance alone was worth it, but the dialogue kept me interested in what was happening onscreen as well. I would recommend this film, but would tell the viewer to remember the long viewing time before sitting down to watch it.